Source-collection integrity
Passed
Confirms current-data acquisition, provenance and quality-stage mechanics only.
Current publication status
Scientific episode release
Not Applicable No Evaluable Screen
0 screening event(s); required missing dimensions: none reported.
Acquisition status distinguishes primary monitoring evidence from mandatory contextual sources. A degraded context harvest may support a clearly labelled data-availability release, but not an environmental episode, source, compliance, exposure or health finding. No current environmental episode assessment was possible because no selected monitoring site met the freshness threshold. The newest accepted reporting-site observation was 11.7 hours old at collection. No fresh eligible episode was available for corroboration. Episode-level convergence was not applicable; configured join readiness is reported separately.
A green harvest gate is not a pollution-source finding. Source attribution, causation, permit breach, exposure and health conclusions remain prohibited unless the separate scientific gate passes.
Current release posture
1 mandatory stream gate(s) remain constrained. The public site reports verified acquisition and readiness without converting incomplete data into scientific claims.
Readiness status
Overall status: api_led_screening_and_evidence_convergence_not_source_determination
Public claim level: Screening and readiness notes only
Readiness dashboard
Evidence checks
| Comparator Checked | not_applicable_no_fresh_screening_events_monitor_roles_pending |
|---|---|
| Meteorology Checked | official_meteorology_acquired_no_event_alignment_not_applicable |
| Monitor Role Checked | candidate_monitor_roles_unvalidated |
| Parser Validated | quality_validated_current_measurements |
| Provenance Recorded | complete_current_measurement_provenance |
| Reviewer Challenge Recorded | claim_Framework started |
| Source Acquired | complete_primary_measurements |
| Time Alignment Checked | not_applicable_no_fresh_screening_events |
Review requirement
A gate marked partial, context-only, needs-review, missing or not-ready must not be used as proof. It is a prompt for follow-up review and expert challenge.
Scientific evidence and software assurance are different
Scientific evidence
Measurements, station and regional coverage, descriptive calculations, source records and stated limitations are the evidence available for review.
Engineering assurance
Automated checks confirm that the pipeline followed its declared rules. They do not constitute peer review, accreditation, regulatory approval or institutional endorsement.